All posts by Ray Ivey

Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

Movie reviews should have some semblance of objectivity.  This one will not.  Sorry about that.

 I lived in New York from 1979 to 1990, which means I was at the epicenter of the outbreak of the AIDS epidemic.  When it began, in 1981, I was a deeply closeted student at the American Academy of Dramatic Arts.  I had zero gay life at the time, and I don’t think the disease even began seeping into my consciousness until at least 1983, which is the first time I knew someone who was diagnosed.

 The stunning new documentary How to Survive a Plague begins four years after this, when there had already been several hundred thousand worldwide deaths to this horrifying illness. It’s the story of ACT UP, an activist organization which arose in response to the government’s slow reaction to the epidemic.

 The organization was famous (or notorious, depending on your point of view) for its aggressive civil disobedience tactics.  It launched nonviolent but highly disruptive assaults on City Hall, the National Institutes of Health, and perhaps most infamously, St. Patrick’s Cathedral.

The problem that ACT UP (which stands for AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, which makes it a sort of compound acronym) was trying to solve was the glacial pace of research and drug testing.  The amazing thing about their story is that they actually largely succeeded in their goals.

 This was a story that I knew pretty well, but I still found the film riveting, because it is so well made. 

Activist Peter Staley

One big challenge the filmmakers had was the fact that the footage they needed was mostly decades old, and many of the principal players were dead.  They surmounted this challenge admirably, and the film presents a lively cast of fiercely dedicated characters.  These were people whose lives had been utterly disrupted by this horribly, mysterious and deadly disease.  For them, the stakes couldn’t have been higher.

 I can’t remember the last time I saw a film that actually made me feel ashamed.  I sat there watching the ferocious dedication these men and women had to saving lives.  They put themselves, their very bodies, on the line, time and again.  What was I doing during those years?  Auditioning for acting parts, working as a word processor, and going to plays and movies.  Why didn’t I help?  Just because I, as a still-closeted person, was relatively unaffected by the plague?  Shame on me.

Larry Kramer, relentless and indispensible agitator

 I was inspired by these activists, many of which knew they themselves were doomed.  They knew that the answers they were demanding would most likely come too late to benefit them.  They were trying to stave off the holocaust for the future.  And as anyone who has benefitted from the protease inhibitors that have helped arrest the development of the virus can tell you, they largely managed to do just that.  Sure, there’s no cure yet, but an HIV+ diagnosis is not usually the impending death sentence that it was in 1988.

 One more great thing about the movie is that it pulls off a jaw-dropping reveal very late in the movie that I won’t spoil.  This gimmick gave the movie even more power than it already had.

If you can take revisiting such a painful time, I highly recommend you check out How to Survive a Plague.  Directed by David France.

Average Rating: 4.7 out of 5 based on 240 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

My friend Rusty Cawley was amazed that I recognized author Michael Lewis on the street the other day.  He asked me how that was possible.  Here’s my reply:

Rusty, to properly answer this I have to mention my Theory of Special Powers.  Everyone you know who’s worth anything has Special Powers in some area.  My sister Donna has Special Organizing Powers, for example (she could have straightened out the mess in Iraq).  Your own mother has the Special I’m Always Sweet and Fabulous Power.  Remember James Boedecker?  He had the Special I Was Born With This Ridiculous Physique Power.

I have several Special Powers, and one of them is Remembering and Recognizing Show business People.  I have a casting director’s memory.  In fact, casting directors think I should BE a casting director.

Also, I’ve been a bookwork since second grade.  And I am a lifelong Lazy Writer.  So I have the Lazy Writer’s worship of people who can actually put down the donut/PS3 controller/Kindle long enough to actually write something and finish it and get it published.

Michael Lewis

I LOVE my writers.  I’ve written to many of them over the years, and they ALWAYS write back.  I have received letters from Garry Trudeau, Charles Schulz, Ray Bradbury, Stephen King, Isaac Asimov – and all of those were before email.  I watch interviews with them.  I read about them.  I read their blogs.  I go meet them and hear them speak at Book Festivals.

So I remember writer’s faces.  Also, it doesn’t hurt if they are handsome, like Michael Lewis.

Of course, handsome isn’t a requirement.  I’d instantly recognize Joyce Carrol Oates, and we all know she looks like an “After” photo of a certain diminutive fisherman named Sméagol.

So this Special Power of mine acts like an antenna that’s always powered up.  So I notice things like, Hey, that’s Edward Albee I his running shorts on the elevator with me.  Or, hey, that’s Alex Rocco from The Godfather on the elevator with me.  Or I meet Gore Vidal in a porn shop in West Hollywood.  Or, Hi, aren’t you Octavia Butler perusing the stacks at the library next to me?  Or, look, I’m holding the door at Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf for Oscar Winner Linda Hunt.  It happens to me all the time.

I have no doubt that I would instantly recognize Terry Pratchett, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, George R. R. Martin, John Scalzi, Michael Connelly, or John Irving.

I’m sure you have Special Powers, too, Rusty.  What are they?

Average Rating: 4.4 out of 5 based on 236 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

Great character actors don’t get to play the lead that often.  And while he’s a huge star on Broadway, veteran thespian Frank Langella has rarely played the lead in a film.  Of course, he’s had a long, rich film career that’s spanned almost fifty years, but with a few exceptions (The Twelve Chairs, Dracula, Frost/Nixon), he’s usually the guy adding some class to the project in a supporting role.

So it’s always a good thing to find Mr. L. playing the rare lead.  In Robot and Frank, he plays Frank, an aging, divorced ex-con whose two busy children (James Marsden and Liv Tyler) are trying to cope with his increasing senility.

Since the movie is set in the near future, Marsden shows up one day with a gift for Frank:  a robot assistant.  Naturally, Frank hates the idea, but his son gives him an ultimatum:  Work with the robot or face exile into the Old Folks Home.

Thus begins a quietly delightful relationship.  Robot (that’s his only name) is voiced by the talented Peter Saarsgard, and he’s programmed to not only help Frank around the house, but to work on his overall health as well.  He forces Frank to adhere to a strict schedule and to exercise.  He further annoys Frank by planting a garden.

But since Frank is a cat burglar by trade, and since this is a movie, it’s only a matter of time before Frank manipulates Robot into becoming his new partner in crime.

I realize on the page that sounds pretty silly, but the movie pulls it off quite elegantly.  It reminds me of one of Blake Snyder’s screenwriting rules:  Having Fun With the Premise.  It’s awfully fun to watch Frank coach Robot on lock picking and cajole him into accepting that planning a heist is actually healthy for his mental acuity.

Besides Robot and his kids, the other important relationship in the movie is with the local librarian (the always-more-than-welcome Susan Sarandon).  Frank enjoys flirting with her, and during the course of the movie he tries to find opportunities to step up his game.

Robot and Frank is a model of modest, sturdy, engaging filmmaking.  It should be referenced in film school.  It’s full of lovely little details that help tell the story.  One example is when the local sheriff (Jeremy Sisto) witnesses a casual display of Robot’s superhuman agility.  You can see the wheels start to turn in his head.

The film is also full of very nicely framed and composed shots.  There are times, like a late scene involving the two title characters, where the staging actually adds layers of meaning in an elegant way.

Robot and Frank is also an example of one of my personal favorite subgenres:  The Small Science Fiction film.  The movie clearly had a small budget, but it’s so charming you could care less that you’re obviously watching a small person (Dana Morgan) walking around in a robot suit.

The science fiction angle also adds additional context and food for thought that wouldn’t be present otherwise.  It’s easy to see that this is a buddy movie, but it’s also about the changing way we humans interact with technology.  It’s even about how we think about technology.  What happens when an artificial intelligence we’re talking to seems like a real person?  How does this change the relationship?  How does it change us?

The director of the film is Jake Schreier, who is the former keyboardist for Francis and the Lights, and the warm and clever screenplay is by Christopher D. Ford.

I can only make one serious criticism of the movie:  In the third act, there’s a reveal regarding Frank’s faulty memory that’s not entirely convincing.

But that’s a very small quibble.  Find an art house cinema near you and see Robot and Frank.

 

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 161 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

I travel a lot for work, and I frequently find these two weird books in a drawer in my hotel room. One of them is obviously sophomoric claptrap fantasy revisionist Jewish history. The other one, however, is truly awful: the main characte…

r is a petty, jealous tyrant who disallows basic human attributes like sexuality, but who enthusiastically promotes murder, genocide, intolerance, xenophobia, and misogyny.

For a while I considered calling ahead and asking the hotel to keep these reprehensible books out of my hotel room, but then I realized, this isn’t about me. What about the children? Both books are written with a certain air of authority. What if an impressionable child, or even an adult with sub-normal critical thinking skills, were to come across these books? Think of the damage that could occur on these unsuspecting travelers!!

So now, it’s part of my public service to take these books out of the hotel the morning after I check in and dispose of them, so they can’t hurt anyone.

Sure, it’s a lot of trouble, but I have to think of the greater good here. In this small way I make the world a little safer.

I encourage all my fellow travelers who care about their fellow man to do the same.See more

Average Rating: 5 out of 5 based on 286 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

Like any red-blooded American gay homosexual sodomite, I’ve been looking forward to the new Steve Soderberg film Magic Mike for some time.  The filmmakers have used flashy beefcake images to sell the movie for over a year now, and I have to say that, unlike movies with names like Thor, the filmmakers play fair on that score:  You do see a lot of shiny, handsome, buff guys bumping and grinding in this movie.

Major Thespian! (really!!)

I actually have less to say about the movie itself than I do about the cast.  So let’s dispense with the movie stuff first:

Magic Mike is very lite entertainment, done professionally well by a good director, decent screenwriters and good actors.  There’s nothing inspired about any of it, but it doesn’t sink into stupidity, either, which is a definite possibility in a movie about male strippers in Tampa.

My Channing Tatum stars as an ambitious thirty-year old lunk named Mike who is saving up for his dream – a custom furniture crafting business – by working as a roofer, bookkeeper, car detailer, and stripper.  When he meets a hangdog but cute and buff nineteen-year-old loser (Alex Pettyfer), he unwisely brings him into his cheesy world of spangled jockstraps, drug dealers and giddy, dangerous women.  Possible romance (with the loser’s sister) and mild misadventures ensue.

Nothing in the movie feels particularly important; the stakes are all there, but feel a bit like Senior Class Play stakes rather than the real thing.  And that’s okay.  After all, did I mention this is a movie about male strippers in Tampa.

So let’s talk about the cast.

First of all, Matthew McConaughey.  He gives it his best shot at Dallas, the Tampa strip club entrepreneur with dreams of moving his act to Miami.  His role is a little bit like Tom Cruise’s in Jerry McGuire:  the character plays to all of his strengths andweaknesses, so that even the things that may generally annoy you about the star really work as this sleazy, aging yet still ridiculously buff hustler.  It’s not quite Oh God Please Give Me My Overdue Oscar Nomination Acting, but it’s close.  I’m not a particular fan of the man, but he’s a professional, and he brings it here, even acquitting himself well in his one big strip scene.

Ask me about Stanislavsky's Acting Method as I grind my crotch into your face.

However, I’m quite puzzled by the presence of Matt Bomer and Joe Manganiello in “supporting” roles as two of the other strippers at the club.  Puzzled because they have absolutely nothing to play.  I can see why the filmmakers wanted them in the movie:  they certainly add marquee value.  But they seriously need new agents.  Because they should have only agreed to bare their asses in the picture if the screenwriters and the director guaranteed that they’d actually have roles to play.  As it is, they’re glorified extras.  They barely have lines.  It’s almost distracting.  Manganiello and Bomer are both good actors with thriving television careers, and they should have demanded more high-quality involvement in the movie.  Or passed.

Alex Pettyfer, as the kid, is his usual pretty self.  He needs to work much harder to hide his British accent, though.

Crikey! I should have spent less time working out and more time with the dialog coach!

I was happy to see Gabriel Iglesias in the movie.  I’ve been impressed by him ever since he appeared on (and was thrown off of ) “Last Comic Standing” in 2006.

Now to the women.  I really rather enjoyed Olivia Munn, an actress/module I am most familiar with for her former hosting duties on G4’s “Attack of the Show!”  She’s good as Mike’s bisexual booty call buddy.

As to Cody Horn as Mike’s love interest, well… I’m afraid that considering her very thin resume coupled with the fact that her father is Alan F. Horn, former head of Warner Brothers Studios and current chairman of Walt Disney Studios, my only reaction is “well isn’t that special, she got to star in a movie!!”  For her next project, she might consider expanding her emotional range past the Pretty Pout.  And to Soderberg:  I hope the favor you’re putting in the bank in return for hiring her turns out to be worth it.

Watch me go through the full range of emotions from A to B.

Finally, the movie’s star, Channing Tatum.  This is my Channing’s fourth major release this year, and here’s the thing:  He’s been quite good in all of them.  They weren’t all blockbusters, certainly, but then, his only movies that make big money seem to be the ones based on cheesy 80’s properties (21 Jump Street, G.I. Joe).

Tatum has great looks and solid movie star charisma.  He’s also an indecently good street dancer for a white boy, and he acutally is a former stripper, so his moves in Magic Mike are unassailable.  His acting agility is convincing and effective, as well.

The bottom line is, anyone who makes fun of Channing Tatum at this point in his career is stupid and wrong.

So:  Can I recommend Magic Mike?  Depends on how much you want to watch legitimate actors impersonate slimy male strippers.  If that does it for you, then get thee to the theater.  If not, well, you might be better off catching Moonrise Kingdom.

Average Rating: 4.6 out of 5 based on 225 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

My new article about the re-release of the entire Quest For Glory series is live at JustAdventure.com!  http://www.justadventure.com/article/160/featured-article-do-i-want-to-return-to-quest-for-glory

Average Rating: 4.6 out of 5 based on 224 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

You can read my new interview with Chris Jones, creator of the legendary “Tex Murphy” computer game series.  It went live on www.justadventure.com today!  http://www.justadventure.com/article/145/interviews-interview-with-chris-jones-and-aaron-conners-of-big-finish-games

Average Rating: 4.9 out of 5 based on 283 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

My new column, Eaten By A Grue, has premiered at www.justadventure.com.  I’ve been writing for the site for over 12 years, but this is the first time I’ve had a regular column!  In it I’ll be discussing, you guessed it, games.

Here’s a link to the very first column, which deals with my predictions about he much-ballyhooed new game Diablo III:

http://justadventure.com/article/140/featured-article-tell-me-i’m-wrong-about-diablo-3

And here’s a link to the second column, which is my Kickstarter Wishlist.:  http://justadventure.com/article/143/featured-article-kickstart-me!

I hope you enjoy the new column!

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 197 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

The author just comes right out and says it:  Games are better than reality.  But this book isn’t an exhortation to drop out of real life:  it’s a recipe for remaking reality based on what we’ve learned from games.  We’re only five months into 2012 and I’ve already read two books this year that blew my mind.  The first one was Ready Player One.  This is the other one.

I’ve been a gamer for many years.  I’ve always felt luckier than my non-gamer friends, who I think seriously don’t know what they’re missing.  I feel gaming is far superior to passive pastimes like watching television.

Jane McGonigal is a game designer and researcher, and her amazing new book makes me prouder than ever to be a gamer.  In her beautifully written book, she describes why we love games, why games are better than reality, and how we can use games to make reality better.

Jane McGonigal

The book is broken up into three parts.  In the first part, McGonigal explores just what it is about games that makes them such effective engines for happiness.  Reading this section was pure joy, because it made me feel like someone much smarter than me had reached into my head and then sat me down to patiently explain to me all the reasons I love my favorite pastime so much.  Every single thing she asserts – that games provide a better work/reward feedback loop, that games make failure fun and educational, that games can improve our social connections, and many more – rang utterly true.

As fun as that portion of the book was, it was all stuff that I already knew intuitively, even if I’d never managed to articulate it as well as the author did.

But my brain really started to go crazy with the second portion of the book, which deals with how games can begin to make our real lives better.  She educated me about the concept of alternate reality games, which are just as fun as they sound.

Playing Tombstone Hold'em
Playing Tombstone Hold'em

McGonigal describes two new games that help the unpleasant experience of commercial flight more bearable.  A game that helps facilitate physical therapy and recovery.  Schools using games as a way to create more effective education.  Games played in graveyards that make us happier even as we think about death.

But it’s the third part of the book that really blew my mind.  In it, McGonigal explores how really large games played by large groups of people can change the world.

Remember that notorious scandal involving the Members of Parliament in the UK abusing their expense accounts?  The newspaper The Guardian was covering the story and wanted a full accounting of all of the MP’s expenses, so it could investigate just how serious the corruption was.

Under intense pressure, the government grudgingly agreed to release four years’ worth of records, but they made sure that they provided the data in the most unhelpful format possible:  558, 832 separate pdf documents.  The Guardian knew it didn’t have the personpower to scan and evaluate all of those images.  So it decided to crowdsource the problem.  It invited the public to get involved.  It launched the first-ever Massively Multiplayer Investigative Journalism Project, which it called Investigate Your MP’s Expenses.

Did it work?  It worked staggeringly well.  Just three days into the contest, 170, 000 of the documents had been studied!!  When the project was over, the resulting scandal led to resignations, indictments, and changed rules and laws.

Because The Guardian decided to make it into a game.

The book is rife with energizing examples of harnessing the power of online social networking and using games to make the world better.

Many people think crowdsourcing could be a way that we could solve enormous, dangerous problems, like global warming, water shortages, or why George Takei doesn’t get better roles in major films.

I can’t remember another book that prompted me to join so many different websites!  I am eager to participate in these worthy and exciting projects.

Reality is Broken isn’t billed as a self-help book, but I think it’s the best self-help book I’ve ever read.  I heartily recommend it to anyone who is interested in how play and technology can make our lives more happy and fun, and how we can use games together to make the world a better place.

 

http://realityisbroken.org/

Average Rating: 4.9 out of 5 based on 264 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter
Facebooktwitterrssinstagram

Obama is Not a Muslim (No Matter How Badly You Want Him to Be)

All of my grandparents were Christian.

Both of my parents were raised Christian.

I spent two years in Episcopal schools!  I spent twenty years attending Southern Baptist churches.  My old copy of The New American Standard Bible is as marked up and highlighted as a college textbook.

The summer after my senior year in high school, I won Second Place in the State of Texas in the Baptist Youth Speakers Tournament.  Also that summer, I went on a mission trip to California, where I proselytized the Good News to innocent children and families in Yosemite Park.

There are hundreds of witnesses who can attest to my participation in all these Christian activities.  People who could cheerfully stand in front of a news camera and attest to the fact that, at least in 1976, I was a staunch devotee of Jesus Christ.

And yet, despite this avalanche of damning evidence to the contrary, I solemnly aver that I am not a Christian.  Incredible?  Unlikely?  Impossible to believe?

But true.  I have not been a Christian since 1979.

None of my friends seem to have a problem understanding this fact.  My friends who are still Christian are sometimes plenty irritated with me, I’m so very much NOT a Christian these days.  My friends understand that my religion is what I say it is, right now.

And yet, millions of Right-Wing pinheads in this country won’t afford the same courtesy to the President of the United States.

Obama’s middle name is Hussein.  [gasp!]  His grandfather was an African Muslim [sharp intake of breath!]  Even worse, Obama has consistently spoken with inclusion and good will to Muslim world.  [scandalous!!]

Obama’s father, though raised a Muslim, was, like me, a confirmed atheist before he was out of college.

Did Obama live in Muslim countries when he was young?  Uh, yeah, he did.  So did my friends David Givens and Amy Fox.  And I’m pretty sure neither one of them are Muslim.

Obama has written extensively about his life.  NOWHERE in these writings does he claim to be anything other than a Christian.

So what do you believe, Right-Wingers?  That from before he was a teenager, Obama had a secret plan to lead America into the evils of Sharia Law by initiating a lifelong deception about his religion?

He went to a Christian Church in Chicago for twenty years.  Was that all a ruse?

Are you people in third grade?

Do you know anything about Islam at all?  If you did, you’d understand that it’s not really possible to be a Secret Muslim.

Unlike Christianity, which does not require any outward change in your behavior at all (lots of suggestions, but no requirements), when you become a Muslim you actually have to do things.  Two very visible examples of this are having to eat halal (the Muslim equivalent of kosher) and the ritual of the Salah.

If Obama was a Secret Muslim, the food service people in the White House would know it, since every meal they would have prepared for the President for the last four years would have had to be halal.  This is not something that could be done without attracting a lot of attention.

The Salah is the required ritual of prayer every Muslim must fulfill at five absolutely specific times per day.  I’m talking about the prayer mat, the facing Mecca thing, etc.

There is absolutely no way any President could perform this ritual for four years, five times a day, and word of it not get out.  And guess what?  If Obama doesn’t observe the Salah, he’s not a Muslim.  Yeah, that’s how that works.

And one more thing.  What if it were true?  What if the President was a Muslim?  You realize that to object to that is un-American and unconstitutional, right?  Yeah, it’s in the Constitution that no religious test ever be required for political office in the United States.  That Religious Freedom thing you keep wailing about?  It cuts all ways.  It applies to Muslims, too.  You can be a real American and be a Catholic, a Baptist, a Buddhist, a Wiccan, a Hindu, a Muslim, or even someone who has no religion at all, like me.  And if you disagree with the preceding sentence, you are a religious bigot who doesn’t respect the Constitution.

I understand that many of you despise our President.  I get it.  I felt the same way about Bush II.  But here’s the key difference in how Democrats expressed their political dissatisfaction compared to a huge percentage of self-identifying Republicans today:

We didn’t make stupid shit up about the President  We talked about the REAL things about George Bush that we didn’t like.

The Right-Wing Obama Fantasists have created an utterly fictional Obama.  It’s childish, un-American, and pathetic.

I’ll listen to you rail against Obamacare all day.  I’ll hear your disagreement with the rollback of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.  You can talk to me about any policy the Obama Administration has enacted that you disagree with.  We’re all Americans, let’s argue about politics!

But I am done listening to you spread irresponsible and childish lies about the lawfully elected President of the United States.

Have the stones to criticize our Actual president.  Not some made up, racist fantasy.

Grow the fuck up.

Average Rating: 4.4 out of 5 based on 235 user reviews.

Facebooktwitter